Volume loss converting DSF to Wav with Convolution

[Snoopy08]

(25-07-2019 09:23)richardpl Wrote:  What you found wrong with DSF conversion, and how you did it?

In critical listening, the converted 24/176.4 tracks had less body and considerably less bass. Even CD 16/44.1 was better than ffmpeg on-the-fly conversion!

I ended converting all the DSF files using Tascam Hi Res Editor. It was a manual conversion and tags had to added with MP3Tag using its tag copy capability.